- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
Authors
Keywords
Systematic review, AMSTAR, Reporting, Methodological study, Quality assessment
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-06-18
DOI
10.1186/s12874-018-0520-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
- (2016) Uta Wegewitz et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
- (2015) Clovis Mariano Faggion BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties
- (2015) Dawid Pieper et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: a systematic meta-review
- (2015) S. Joyce et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- “We Used a Validated Questionnaire”: What Does This Mean and Is It an Accurate Statement in Urologic Research?
- (2015) Adam S. Dowrick et al. UROLOGY
- Diagnostic tools for alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias: an overview of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews
- (2014) Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez et al. BMC Neurology
- Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review
- (2012) Dawid Pieper et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011
- (2012) Lisa Hartling et al. PLoS One
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
- (2009) Beverley J. Shea et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now