4.6 Article

Low-dose aspirin use and survival in colorectal cancer: results from a population-based cohort study

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4142-y

Keywords

Aspirin; Colorectal cancer; Survival; Pharmaco-epidemiology

Categories

Funding

  1. Queen's University Belfast
  2. Health & Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency (HSC R&D Division) Doctoral Fellowship
  3. Cancer Research UK Population Health Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Cancer Research UK [17592] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_CF023241] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Public Health Agency [EAT/4905/13] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Aspirin has been proposed as a novel adjuvant agent in colorectal cancer (CRC). Six observational studies have reported CRC-specific survival outcomes in patients using aspirin after CRC diagnosis but the results from these studies have been conflicting. Using a population-based cohort design this study aimed to assess if low-dose aspirin use after diagnosis reduced CRC-specific mortality. Methods: A cohort of 8391 patients with Dukes' A-C CRC (2009-2012) was identified from the Scottish Cancer Registry and linked to national prescribing and death records. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRC-specific mortality were calculated using time-dependent Cox regression. Results: There were 1064 CRC-specific deaths after a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Post-diagnostic low-dose aspirin use was not associated with a reduction in CRC-specific mortality either before or after adjustment for confounders (adjusted HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36). In sensitivity analysis pre-diagnostic low-dose aspirin was also not associated with reduced CRC-specific mortality (adjusted HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.05). Conclusion: Low-dose aspirin use, either before or after diagnosis, did not prolong survival in this population-based CRC cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available