Smokers’ interest in a lung cancer screening programme: a national survey in England
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Smokers’ interest in a lung cancer screening programme: a national survey in England
Authors
Keywords
Lung cancer screening, Early detection, Screening uptake, Smoking, Attitudes, Behavioural science
Journal
BMC CANCER
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-05-02
DOI
10.1186/s12885-018-4430-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Smokers are less likely than non-smokers to seek help for a lung cancer ‘alarm’ symptom
- (2016) C Friedemann Smith et al. THORAX
- High-risk older smokers' perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about lung cancer screening
- (2016) Janine K. Cataldo Cancer Medicine
- Smoking is associated with pessimistic and avoidant beliefs about cancer: results from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership
- (2015) S L Quaife et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cancer Fear: Facilitator and Deterrent to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2015) C. Vrinten et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Endoscopic treatment of massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding related to appendiceal stump
- (2015) Hamid Wani et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Lung cancer screening: what do long-term smokers know and believe?
- (2015) Lisa Carter-Harris et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Perception of Lung Cancer among the General Population and Comparison with Other Cancers
- (2015) Julien Mazières et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Barriers to uptake among high-risk individuals declining participation in lung cancer screening: a mixed methods analysis of the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial
- (2015) Noor Ali et al. BMJ Open
- Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening
- (2015) Steven B. Zeliadt et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Development of a scale to assess cancer stigma in the non-patient population
- (2014) Laura AV Marlow et al. BMC CANCER
- The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening
- (2014) F. E. McRonald et al. Cancer Prevention Research
- Targeting of Low-Dose CT Screening According to the Risk of Lung-Cancer Death
- (2013) Stephanie A. Kovalchik et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Predictive validity of the Motivation To Stop Scale (MTSS): A single-item measure of motivation to stop smoking
- (2012) D. Kotz et al. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
- Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers
- (2012) Sirisha Jonnalagadda et al. LUNG CANCER
- An international measure of awareness and beliefs about cancer: development and testing of the ABC
- (2012) Alice E Simon et al. BMJ Open
- 2. Tobacco-attributable cancer burden in the UK in 2010
- (2011) D M Parkin BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial
- (2011) P Hewitson et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Participation bias in a randomised trial of screening for lung cancer
- (2011) Mie Sara Hestbech et al. LUNG CANCER
- Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
- (2011) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study
- (2011) Deesha Patel et al. THORAX
- Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Randomized National Lung Screening Trial
- (2010) et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Informed participation in a randomised controlled trial of computed tomography screening for lung cancer
- (2009) K. A. M. van den Bergh et al. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started