Aggressive primary treatments with favourable 5-year survival for screen-interval breast cancers
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Aggressive primary treatments with favourable 5-year survival for screen-interval breast cancers
Authors
Keywords
Breast neoplasms, Mass screening, Treatment, Survival, Cancer registry, Interval Cancer, Data linkage
Journal
BMC CANCER
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-04-19
DOI
10.1186/s12885-018-4319-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Interval Cancers in Breast Cancer Screening: Comparison of Stage and Biological Characteristics with Screen-Detected Cancers or Incident Cancers in the Absence of Screening
- (2018) Francesca Caumo et al. TUMORI
- Short-term and long-term survival of interval breast cancers taking into account prognostic features
- (2016) Solenne Delacour-Billon et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Surveillance of waiting times for access to treatment: a registry-based computed approach in breast cancer care
- (2015) A. Quillet et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties
- (2015) Charles Harding et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Temporal representation of care trajectories of cancer patients using data from a regional information system: an application in breast cancer
- (2014) Gautier Defossez et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
- (2014) Jacques Ferlay et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Breast cancer in European Union: An update of screening programmes as of March 2014 (Review)
- (2014) E. ALTOBELLI et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
- Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study
- (2014) H. Weedon-Fekjaer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial
- (2014) A. B. Miller et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Are prognostic factors more favorable for breast cancer detected by organized screening than by opportunistic screening or clinical diagnosis? A study in Loire-Atlantique (France)
- (2013) Antoine Vanier et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Comparison of Clinical-Pathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of True Interval and Screen-Detected Invasive Breast Cancer Among Participants of a Canadian Breast Screening Program: A Nested Case-Control Study
- (2012) Daniel Rayson et al. Clinical Breast Cancer
- Aggressiveness features and outcomes of true interval cancers
- (2012) Laia Domingo et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
- The Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality in Europe: A Review of Trend Studies
- (2012) Sm Moss et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Summary of the Evidence of Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes in Europe and First Estimate of the Benefit and Harm Balance Sheet
- (2012) Eugenio Paci JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Overdiagnosis in Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer in Europe: A Literature Review
- (2012) Donella Puliti et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Prognosis in women with interval breast cancer: population based observational cohort study
- (2012) M. Kalager et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Correcting for Lead Time and Length Bias in Estimating the Effect of Screen Detection on Cancer Survival
- (2008) S. W. Duffy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone?
- (2008) G C Wishart et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started