Journal
BIOSCIENCE
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 125-133Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix150
Keywords
conservation policy; marine biodiversity offset; marine compensation; no net loss
Categories
Funding
- Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
- University of Queensland Centennial Scholarship
- Australian Research Council [FT140100516]
- Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme's Threatened Species Recovery Hub
- Australian Research Council [FT140100516] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Biodiversity compensation policy programs such as offsetting are increasingly being expanded to the marine realm. We reviewed the literature on biodiversity offsets and related compensatory policy to determine where marine offset policies occur. We also identified the most important differences between marine and terrestrial systems that are likely to have implications for how offsetting is conducted. We found that 77 nations had compensatory policies that enabled the use of offsets in the marine environment. Two important differences between marine and terrestrial offsets emerged: (1) biophysical differences, such as greater marine connectivity, lower likelihood of restoration success, and data paucity, and (2) social or governance differences, such as a lack of private ownership and a greater probability of leakage. We conclude that without better evaluation and innovation, it is premature to conclude that marine offsets can be effective. The lessons learned from the development of terrestrial offsets provide an opportunity to improve their application to marine ecosystems.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available