4.5 Review

DNA methylation alterations-potential cause of endometriosis pathogenesis or a reflection of tissue heterogeneity?

Journal

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 273-282

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioy067

Keywords

endometriosis; epigenetics; DNA methylation; tissue heterogeneity; deconvolution

Funding

  1. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT34-16]
  2. Enterprise Estonia [EU48695]
  3. EU FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IAPP, SARM [EU324509]
  4. European Commission Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [692065]
  5. MSCA-RISE-2015 project MOMENDO [691058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alterations in the DNA methylation pattern of endometriotic lesions and endometrium of endometriosis patients have been proposed as one potential factor accompanying the endometriosis development. Although many differentially methylated genes have been associated with the pathogenesis of this disease, the overlap between the results of different studies has remained small. Among other potential confounders, the impact of tissue heterogeneity on the outcome of DNA methylation studies should be considered, as tissues are mixtures of different cell types with their own specific DNA methylation signatures. This review focuses on the results of DNA methylation studies in endometriosis from the cellular heterogeneity perspective. We consider both the studies using highly heterogeneous whole-lesion biopsies and endometrial tissue, as well as pure cell fractions isolated from lesions and endometrium to understand the potential impact of the cellular composition to the results of endometriosis DNA methylation studies. Also, future perspectives on how to diminish the impact of tissue heterogeneity in similar studies are provided. Summary Sentence Cellular heterogeneity of endometriotic lesions and endometrial biopsies has significant impact on the results of DNA methylation studies in endometriosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available