4.3 Article

Malignant Effusions Correlate With Poorer Prognosis in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages 707-715

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1309/AJCP6LXA2LKFZAMC

Keywords

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); Effusions; Fluid cytology; Prognosis; Treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST-103-2320-B-006-020-MY3]
  2. National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan [NCKUH-10204008]
  3. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan [DOH101-TD-C-111-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Serous effusions are a common manifestation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, their prognostic significance is controversial. Methods: We searched for consecutive patients who had DLBCL with effusions from 1999 through 2007. Primary effusion lymphoma was excluded. The presence of tumor cells in effusions (malignant effusions) was determined by cytology supplemented by flow cytometry, cell blocks with special studies, polymerase chain reaction for clonality, or conventional cytogenetics. Results: Forty-one (18.4%) patients had effusions, with 24 (58.5%) developing at diagnosis and 17 (41.5%) during tumor course. Nineteen patients (46.0%) had malignant effusions, with six (31.6%) from local extension and 13 (68.4%) through wide dissemination. Interestingly, malignant effusion correlated with a high International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (r = 0.490, P = .002) and high tumor stage (r = 0.342, P = .031) and was a poor prognosticator (P < .001, log-rank test), even worse than stage IV disease (P = .036). In the multivariate analysis, malignant effusion (P = .056) and supportive care (P = .014) retained significance and were more powerful than IPI score and stage. Conclusions: Patients who have DLBCL with lymphomatous effusions have a poor prognosis and should be treated as having stage IV disease. The analysis of effusions for tumor cells would be a useful addition to the routine workup.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available