4.4 Article

Predatory impacts of alien decapod Crustacea are predicted by functional responses and explained by differences in metabolic rate

Journal

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 2821-2837

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-018-1735-y

Keywords

Freshwater; Invasive species; Biological invasions; Switching; Resource use

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [1299825]
  2. NERC [NE/G015201/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alien predators can have large impacts on prey. It is important that we understand, and ideally predict, these impacts. Here, we compare predatory impacts of size-matched decapod crustaceansinvasive alien Eriocheir sinensis and Pacifastacus leniusculus, and native European Austropotamobius pallipesand use this case study to inform methods for impact prediction. We quantify functional responses (FRs) on three macroinvertebrate prey species, examine switching behaviour, and measure metabolic rates as a possible mechanistic explanation for differences in predation. FRs show a consistent pattern: attack coefficients and maximum feeding rates are ordered E. sinensisP. leniusculusA. pallipes for all prey species. Attack coefficients of E. sinensis are up to 6.7 times greater than those of size-matched crayfish and maximum feeding rates up to 3.0 times greater. FR parameters also differ between the invasive and native crayfish, but only up to 2.6 times. We find no evidence of switching behaviour in crayfish but suggestions of negative switching in E. sinensis. Differences in FR parameters are mirrored by differences in routine, but not standard, metabolic rate. Overall, our data predict strong predatory impacts of E. sinensis, even relative to alien P. leniusculus. Strong impacts of P. leniusculus relative to A. pallipes may be driven more by body size or abundance than per capita effect. FRs vary between prey types in line with existing knowledge of impacts, supporting the use of FRs in quantitative, prey-specific impact predictions. MRs could offer a general mechanistic explanation for differences in predatory behaviour and impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Environmental Sciences

Better off dead: assessment of aquatic disinfectants and thermal shock treatments to prevent the spread of invasive freshwater bivalves

Neil E. Coughlan, Stephanie J. Bradbeer, Ross N. Cuthbert, Eoghan M. Cunningham, Kate Crane, Stephen Potts, Joe M. Caffrey, Frances E. Lucy, Alison M. Dunn, Eithne Davis, Trevor Renals, Claire Quinn, Jaimie T. A. Dick

WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

The effectiveness of e-Learning on biosecurity practice to slow the spread of invasive alien species

Caitriona Shannon, Paul D. Stebbing, Claire H. Quinn, Daniel A. Warren, Alison M. Dunn

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS (2020)

Article Behavioral Sciences

Response behaviour of native lizards and invading wall lizard to interspecific scent: implications for invasion success

Robert J. Williams, Alison M. Dunn, Gavin Hanke, Joel W. Dixon, Christopher Hassall

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

Global economic costs of aquatic invasive alien species

Ross N. Cuthbert, Zarah Pattison, Nigel G. Taylor, Laura Verbrugge, Christophe Diagne, Danish A. Ahmed, Boris Leroy, Elena Angulo, Elizabeta Briski, Cesar Capinha, Jane A. Catford, Tatenda Dalu, Franz Essl, Rodolphe E. Gozlan, Phillip J. Haubrock, Melina Kourantidou, Andrew M. Kramer, David Renault, Ryan J. Wasserman, Franck Courchamp

Summary: Research indicates that the global economic cost of aquatic invasive alien species has reached $345 billion, with the majority attributed to invertebrates, vertebrates, and plants. The highest costs were reported in North America and Asia, primarily due to resource damages. The costs of aquatic invasive species have increased exponentially in recent decades, but are likely underreported.

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

The future for Mediterranean wetlands: 50 key issues and 50 important conservation research questions

Nigel G. Taylor, Patrick Grillas, Hazem Al Hreisha, Ozge Balkiz, Maud Borie, Olivier Boutron, Ana Catita, Jocelyn Champagnon, Semia Cherif, Kerim Cicek, Luis T. Costa, Mohamed Dakki, Mauro Fois, Thomas Galewski, Alessandro Galli, Nicholas M. Georgiadis, Andy J. Green, Virgilio Hermoso, Rezart Kapedani, Manfred A. Lange, Zoran Mateljak, Maher Osta, Eva Papastergiadou, Clairie Papazoglou, Sergi Sabater, Boudjema Samraoui, Farrah Samraoui, Abdelkrim Si Bachir, Eva Tankovic, Mathieu Thevenet, Antonio Troya, William J. Sutherland

Summary: The research team identified key issues and research questions that will impact Mediterranean wetlands between 2020 and 2050, through an online survey and literature review, prioritized by an assessment panel. This analysis will support research, policy, and practice related to environmental conservation and sustainable development in the Mediterranean region.

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Gap analysis of the Ramsar site network at 50: over 150 important Mediterranean sites for wintering waterbirds omitted

Nadege Popoff, Elie Gaget, Arnaud Bechet, Laura Dami, Pierre Defos du Rau, Ilse Geijzendorffer, Anis Guelmami, Jean-Yves Mondain-Monval, Christian Perennou, Marie Suet, Fabien Verniest, Clemence Deschamps, Nigel G. Taylor, Hichem Azafzaf, Nadjiba Bendjedda, Taulant Bino, John J. Borg, Luka Bozic, Mohamed Dakki, Vitor Encarnacao, Kiraz Erciyas-Yavuz, Khaled Etayeb, Clemence Gaudard, Ohad Hatzofe, Tom Langendoen, Christina Ieronymidou, Tibor Mikuska, Blas Molina, Nicky Petkov, Danae Portolou, Tareq Qaneer, Samir Sayoud, Marko Sciban, Goran Topic, Danka Uzunova, Gal Vine, Andrej Vizi, Marco Zenatello, Wed Abdou, Thomas Galewski

Summary: By evaluating 4186 sites in 24 Mediterranean countries, it was found that 161 internationally important waterbird habitats have not yet been declared as Ramsar sites. Among them, 32 very important sites exceed the required level for at least one criterion by double, while 95 sites are not protected by any conservation status.

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of invasive alien species in the Mediterranean basin

Melina Kourantidou, Ross N. Cuthbert, Phillip J. Haubrock, Ana Novoa, Nigel G. Taylor, Boris Leroy, Cesar Capinha, David Renault, Elena Angulo, Christophe Diagne, Franck Courchamp

Summary: Invasive alien species (IAS) in the Mediterranean basin have led to significant economic costs, mainly driven by damages and losses from invasions rather than management expenditure. Costs were predominantly attributed to a few countries, primarily France, Spain, Italy, and Libya. The study highlights the need for improved research and data collection to understand the full extent of invasion costs in the region.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe

Phillip J. Haubrock, Anna J. Turbelin, Ross N. Cuthbert, Ana Novoa, Nigel G. Taylor, Elena Angulo, Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia, Thomas W. Bodey, Cesar Capinha, Christophe Diagne, Franz Essl, Marina Golivets, Natalia Kirichenko, Melina Kourantidou, Boris Leroy, David Renault, Laura Verbrugge, Franck Courchamp

Summary: This study is the first comprehensive effort to quantify the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examine temporal trends in these data. The total costs of IAS in Europe amounted to US$140.20 billion between 1960 and 2020, with significant impacts in large western and central European countries. Temporally, invasion costs have exponentially increased through time, reaching up to US$23.58 billion in 2013 and an extrapolated US$139.56 billion in impacts in 2020.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science

Alec P. Christie, Thomas B. White, Philip Martin, Silviu O. Petrovan, Andrew J. Bladon, Andrew E. Bowkett, Nick A. Littlewood, Anne-Christine Mupepele, Ricardo Rocha, Katherine A. Sainsbury, Rebecca K. Smith, Nigel G. Taylor, William J. Sutherland

Summary: The study reveals that there is a significant publication delay in conservation science, with an average delay of 3.2 years. Studies on Bee Conservation, Sustainable Aquaculture, Management of Captive Animals, Amphibian Conservation, and Control of Freshwater Invasive Species have shorter publication delays. Publication delay has increased over time but has stabilized post-2000s, with no evidence of decline.

PEERJ (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Linking climate change vulnerability research and evidence on conservation action effectiveness to safeguard European seabird populations

Henry Hakkinen, Silviu O. Petrovan, William J. Sutherland, Maria P. Dias, Eric I. Ameca, Steffen Oppel, Ivan Ramirez, Becki Lawson, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Katharine M. Bowgen, Nigel G. Taylor, Nathalie Pettorelli

Summary: The increasing threat of climate change to species' long-term survival requires the integration of scientific knowledge and conservation actions. However, the lack of strategic collection and collation of information on species' climate change vulnerability and the effectiveness of conservation actions hinders decision-making and conservation outcomes. By utilizing a pressure-state-response framework, existing knowledge can be effectively utilized to identify missing information and improve conservation outcomes.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2022)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Unevenly distributed biological invasion costs among origin and recipient regions

Emma. J. J. Hudgins, Ross. N. N. Cuthbert, Phillip. J. J. Haubrock, Nigel. G. G. Taylor, Melina Kourantidou, Dat Nguyen, Alok Bang, Anna. J. J. Turbelin, Desika Moodley, Elizabeta Briski, Syrmalenia. G. G. Kotronaki, Franck Courchamp

Summary: Globalization intensifies the ecological and economic impacts of biological invasions, challenging sustainability. This study identifies the cost distributions of invasions across origin and recipient countries and continents and determines socio-economic and environmental predictors of cost dynamics. The findings highlight the uneven distribution of impacts and costs globally, with Europe being most frequently impacted and reported monetary costs resulting from species with origins in Asia influencing North America.

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Co-developing guidance for conservation: An example for seabirds in the North-East Atlantic in the face of climate change impacts

Henry Hakkinen, Nigel G. Taylor, Nathalie Pettorelli, William J. Sutherland, Jon Aldara, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Christophe Aulert, Rob S. A. van Bemmelen, Daisy Burnell, Bernard Cadiou, Letizia Campioni, Bethany L. Clark, Nina Dehnhard, Maria P. Dias, Leonie Enners, Robert W. Furness, Gunnar thorn or Hallgrimsson, Sjurour Hammer, Erpur Snaer Hansen, Martti Hario, Stephen Hurling, Mark Jessopp, Birgit Kleinschmidt, Meelis Leivits, Klaudyna Maniszewska, Steffen Oppel, Ana Payo-Payo, Daniel Piec, Jaime A. Ramos, Frederic Robin, Iben Hove Sorensen, Antra Stipniece, Danielle L. Thompson, Antonio Vulcano, Silviu Petrovan

Summary: Conservation guidance is an important tool to communicate evidence-based advice to conservation actors, especially in the face of rapidly increasing pressure from climate change. However, the process of developing guidance documents with input from stakeholders can be complicated and costly. There is currently little direct evidence and guidance specifically targeting climate change. This study introduces a process for co-developing guidance for species conservation in the context of a changing climate, using seabirds in the North-East Atlantic as a case study.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2023)

Article Environmental Sciences

Peatland core domain sets: building consensus on what should be measured in research and monitoring

Mark S. Reed, Dylan M. Young, Nigel G. Taylor, Roxane Andersen, Nicholle G. A. Bell, Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz, Matthew Grainger, Andreas Heinemeyer, Kristell Hergoualc'h, Adam M. Gerrand, Johannes Kieft, Haruni Krisnawati, Erik A. Lilleskov, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez, Lulie Melling, Hannah Rudman, Sophie Sjogersten, Jonathan S. Walker, Gavin Stewart

Summary: Lack of data consistency among multiple studies hampers decision-making in policy and practice regarding the conservation and restoration of peatlands. This study proposes a methodological framework and discusses subsequent steps to standardize the measurement and reporting of outcomes in peatland research. These efforts contribute to the creation of reliable datasets that inform evidence-based policy and contribute to the sustainable management of globally significant carbon stores.

MIRES AND PEAT (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

A framework and case study to systematically identify long-term insect abundance and diversity datasets

Eliza M. Grames, Graham A. Montgomery, Douglas H. Boyes, Lynn V. Dicks, Matthew L. Forister, Tanner A. Matson, Shinichi Nakagawa, Kit S. Prendergast, Nigel G. Taylor, Morgan W. Tingley, David L. Wagner, Thomas E. White, Paul Woodcock, Chris S. Elphick

Summary: The study identified 45 multi-year odonate datasets, including 10 studies with data that span more than 10 years, which could contribute to analyses of insect population trends. The methods developed for the EntoGEM project have the potential to be applied to other areas of research.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Tomorrow Never Dies: biodegradation and subsequent viability of invasive macrophytes following exposure to aquatic disinfectants

Kate Crane, Ross N. Cuthbert, Eoghan M. Cunningham, Stephanie J. Bradbeer, Lawrence Eagling, Louise Kregting, Jaimie T. A. Dick, Alison M. Dunn, Emily R. C. Smith, Caitriona Shannon, Joe M. Caffrey, Frances E. Lucy, Eithne Davis, Neil E. Coughlan

MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS (2020)

No Data Available