4.6 Article

Phospholipid composition of packed red blood cells and that of extracellular vesicles show a high resemblance and stability during storage

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.09.012

Keywords

Stored red blood cells; Storage lesion; Extracellular vesicles; Phospholipids; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (TEKES) as part of SalWe research program Personalized Diagnostics and Care (GET IT DONE) [3986/31/2013]
  2. Paivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Clinical Research funding (EVO/VTR) from Helsinki University Hospital [TYH2013343]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Red blood cells (RBCs) are stored up to 35-42 days at 2-6 degrees C in blood banks. During storage, the RBC membrane is challenged by energy depletion, decreasing pH, altered cation homeostasis, and oxidative stress, leading to several biochemical and morphological changes in RBCs and to shedding of extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the storage medium. These changes are collectively known as RBC storage lesions. EVs accumulate in stored RBC concentrates and are, thus, transfused into patients. The potency of EVs as bioactive effectors is largely acknowledged, and EVs in RBC concentrates are suspected to mediate some adverse effects of transfusion. Several studies have shown accumulation of lipid raft associated proteins in RBC EVs during storage, whereas a comprehensive phospholipidomic study on RBCs and corresponding EVs during the clinical storage period is lacking. Our mass spectrometric and chromatographic study shows that RBCs maintain their major phospholipid (PL) content well during storage despite abundant vesiculation. The phospholipidomes were largely similar between RBCs and EVs. No accumulation of raft lipids in EVs was seen, suggesting that the primary mechanism of RBC vesiculation during storage might not be raft-based. Nonetheless, a slight tendency of EV PLs for shorter acyl chains was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available