4.7 Article

Risk of major congenital anomalies after assisted hatching: analysis of three-year data from the national assisted reproduction registry in Japan

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 71-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.029

Keywords

Assisted hatching; birth defect; birth outcome; assisted reproductive technology; complication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess perinatal risk of major congenital anomalies in children born after embryo transfer with assisted hatching (AH). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Cycles registered from 2010 to 2012 and conceived via single-embryo transfer were included for the analysis. Live births, still births after 22 weeks of gestation, and selectively terminated cases because of congenital anomalies were included. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Major congenital anomaly. Result(s): AH was performed in 35,488 cycles among 72,125 included cycles (49.2%). A total of 1,046 major congenital anomalies (1.4%) were identified (1.36% in AH group vs. 1.50% in non-AH group). Overall risks for major congenital anomalies were not significantly different between AH and non-AH groups adjusting for maternal age, calendar year, fetal sex, embryo stage at transfer, and status of cryopreservation. There were 1,009 cases of twins (1.5%) and 10 cases of triplets (0.015%) among all included cycles. No specific organ system demonstrated significant association between AH and non-AH groups. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant association between AH and non-AH groups in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles or in vitro fertilization in fresh cycles. Similar nonsignificant association was observed between early-cleavage or blastocyst stage at transfer in frozen-thawed cycles. Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that AH alone does not increase the risk of major congenital anomaly. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available