4.6 Article

Perspective: Solidifying the impact of cell-free synthetic biology through lyophilization

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 91-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.07.008

Keywords

Cell-free synthetic biology; Paper-based; Sensors; Diagnostics; Portable therapeutic manufacturing; Freeze-dried cell-free reactions

Funding

  1. NSERC [RGPIN-2016-06352]
  2. CIHR [201610FDN-375469]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Grand Challenges Explorations [OPP1160667]
  4. University of Toronto's Connaught Fund
  5. University of Toronto's Medicine by Design initiative
  6. Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1160667] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell-free synthetic biology is an exciting and new branch in the field of synthetic biology. Based on in vitro transcription and translation systems, this application-focused domain builds on decades of cell-free biochemistry and protein expression to operate synthetic gene networks outside of cellular environments. This has brought new and perhaps even unexpected advantages. Chief among these is the ability to operate genetically encoded tools in a sterile and abiotic format. Recent work has extended this advantage by freeze-drying these cell-free systems into dried pellets or embedded paper-based reactions. Taken together, these new ideas have solved the longstanding challenge of how to deploy poised synthetic gene networks in a biosafe mode outside of the laboratory. There is significant excitement in the potential of this newfound venue and the community has begun to extend proof-of-concept demonstrations in important and creative ways. Here I explore these new efforts and provide my thoughts on the challenges and opportunities ahead for freeze-dried, cell-free synthetic biology. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available