4.3 Article

Expression of Metabolism-Related Proteins in Lacrimal Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages 584-592

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPXAYH10WENLTC

Keywords

Adenoid cystic carcinoma; Lacrimal gland; Metabolism-related protein; Protein expression; Salivary gland

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A1002886]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To investigate the expression and the clinical implications of metabolism-related proteins in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in comparison with salivary gland ACC. Methods: Human tissue samples of lacrimal gland ACC (n = 11) and salivary gland ACC (n = 64) were analyzed Immunochemistry was used to measure expression of proteins related to glycolysis (glucose transporter I, hexokinase II, carbonic anhydrase 1X and monocarboxylate transporter 4 [MCT4]), glutaminolysis (glutaminase 1 [GLS1], glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH], and amino acid transporter 2 [ASCT2]), mitochondria (adenosine triphosphate [ATP] synthase, succinate dehydrogenase A [SDHA], and succinate dehydrogenase B), and glycolytic intermediate metabolism 6,hosphoserine phosphatase [PSPH], serine hydroxymethyl transferase I [SHMT1]). Results: GLSI and ASCT2 were more highly expressed, and GDH, ATP synthase, and SDHA were expressed to a lesser degree in lacrimal gland ACC than in salivary gland ACC (P < .05). Lacrimal gland ACC showed less of a mitochondrial phenotype than did salivary gland ACC (P = .001). Positivity of MCT4 and PSPH was related to shorter disease-free survival, and SHMT1 was related to shorter overall survival (P < .05). Conclusions: Lacrimal gland ACC exhibited higher expression of GLSI and ASCT2, compared with salivary gland ACC. Overexpression of MCT4, PSPH, and SHMT1 was associated with poorer prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available