4.3 Article

High Levels of Regulatory T Cells in Blood Are a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue 6, Pages 935-944

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPUJGMVV6ZF4GG

Keywords

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Antitumor immunity; Peripheral blood; Flow cytometry; Regulatory T cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Host immunity likely plays a role in preventing progression of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Analysis of host immune cells may provide useful information for assessing prognosis or possibly clinical management. Methods: Peripheral blood samples from 77 patients with DLBCL and 30 healthy volunteers were analyzed using flow cytometry immunophenotyping. CBC counts, T-cell subsets, and dendritic cells (DCs) were detected, and the results were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics. Results: Compared with healthy volunteers, patients with DLBCL had significantly higher leukocyte and monocyte counts (P < .001); higher percentages of neutrophils (P < .001), natural regulatory T cells (Tregs; CD3+Foxp3+, P < .001), and immature DCs (CD83 CD1a+, P = .005); and lower percentages of lymphocytes (P < .001) and helper T cells (13 =.038). In univariate analysis, high neutrophil counts (>= 6,000/mu L, P = .014) and induced Tregs (CD4+CD25+, P = .026) were poor survival factors along with high International Prognostic Index scores (P < .001) and other high-risk clinical parameters. In multivariate analysis, high Tregs retained significance. Suppression of lymphocytes correlated with poor clinical factors; higher natural Tregs correlated with a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio (P = .035) and more immature DCs (P = .055). Conclusions: Changes in blood immune cells occur in patients with DLBCL. The results also support a suppressive role of Tregs in adaptive immunity and correlate with poor-risk prognostic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available