4.5 Article

Gestational age at birth and wheezing trajectories at 3-11 years

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages 1138-+

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314541

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Rhodes Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Children born preterm have an increased risk of asthma in early childhood. We examined whether this persists at 7 and 11 years, and whether wheezing trajectories across childhood are associated with preterm birth. Design Data were from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, which recruited children at 9 months, with followup at 3, 5, 7 and 11 years. Outcomes Adjusted ORs (aOR) were estimated for recent wheeze and asthma medication use for children born < 32, 32-33, 34-36 and 37-38 weeks' gestation, compared with children born at full term (39-41 weeks) at 7 (n= 12 198) and 11 years (n= 11 690). aORs were also calculated for having 'early-remittent' (wheezing at ages 3 and/or 5 years but not after), 'late' (wheezing at ages 7 and/or 11 years but not before) or 'persistent/relapsing' (wheezing at ages 3 and/or 5 and 7 and/or 11 years) wheeze. Results Birth < 32 weeks, and to a lesser extent at 32-33 weeks, were associated with an increased risk of wheeze and asthma medication use at ages 7 and 11, and all three wheezing trajectories. The aOR for 'persistent/relapsing wheeze' at < 32 weeks was 4.30 (95% CI 2.33 to 7.91) and was 2.06 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.69) at 32-33 weeks. Birth at 34-36 weeks was not associated with asthma medication use at 7 or 11, nor late wheeze, but was associated with the other wheezing trajectories. Birth at 37-38 weeks was not associated with wheeze nor asthma medication use. Conclusions Birth < 37 weeks is a risk factor for wheezing characterised as 'early-remittent' or 'persistent/relapsing' wheeze.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available