4.7 Article

Orthogonal chemical reaction optimization algorithm for global numerical optimization problems

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 3242-3252

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.045

Keywords

Chemical reaction optimization; Orthogonal experimental design; Quantization orthogonal crossover; Global numerical optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61173107, 91320103]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA01A301-01]
  3. Special Project on the Integration of Industry, Education and Research of Guangdong Province, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical reaction optimization (CRO) is a newly proposed, easy to implement metaheuristic inspired by the phenomena between molecules in chemical reactions. However, CRO behaves like a random search to traverse the whole solution space, which could confine the algorithm's search ability. The orthogonal experimental design (OED) method is a robust-design method that can obtain the best combination levels for different factors with a small number of experiment samples based on orthogonal array, thus possesses systematic reasoning ability. In this paper, OCRO, a new method based on CRO and OED, is proposed. This hybrid technique creates new molecules not only by two local search operations in CRO but also incorporates quantization orthogonal crossover (QOX) to serve as a global search operator. OCRO is tested on a set of 23 benchmark functions and compared with variants of CRO, ABC and OXDE, which is also based on the orthogonal method. The computational results show that our framework cannot only find optimal or close-to-optimal solutions but can also obtain more robust results with faster convergence speed in most parts of the experiment, especially for high-dimensional functions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available