4.3 Article

Expression in Whole Blood Samples of miRNA-191 and miRNA-455-3p in Patients with AAA and Their Relationship to Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Repair

Journal

ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 209-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.01.086

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil)
  2. Foundation for Teaching, Research and Assistance (FAEPA, Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify and evaluate the expression response of miRNA-191 and miRNA-455-3p endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) based in whole blood samples. Methods: This report describes a prospective study of a single center of 30 patients with AAA who underwent endovascular repair. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and 6 months post-operatively. The differential expression of the miRNAs was performed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction method, after extraction of the RNA from the blood samples at the 2 moments. In addition, bioinformatic tools were used to determine pathophysiological pathways related to AAA. Results: The miR-191 and miR-455-3p were overexpressed preoperatively. After 6 months post-operatively, miR-191 (median 0.98, IQR 0.5-2.1, P < 0.0001) and miR-455-3p (median 1.4, IQR 0.6-3.1, P = 0.0003) presented a significant reduction in their expressions. There was no correlation between the diameter of the aneurysm and the expression of the miRNAs studied. In addition, analysis of the influence of the various types of devices used for the endovascular treatment of AAA showed no significant differences in the expression of miR-191 and miR-455-3p. Conclusions: Exclusion of the aneurysmal sac after endovascular treatment induces a decrease in the expression of the studied miRNAs in whole blood samples, which suggests a possible use of them as biomarkers of therapeutic success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available