4.3 Editorial Material

Onartuzumab in lung cancer: the fall of Icarus?

Journal

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 487-489

Publisher

EXPERT REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1031219

Keywords

c-MET; non-small-cell lung cancer; ornatuzumab; Phase I; trial design

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of targeted therapies has led to a revolution in non-small-cell lung cancer, and opened up possibilities for improved personalized medicine. With the constant findings of new targets, a lot of inhibitors are being developed. However, reliable biomarkers are urgently needed. The design of clinical trials needs to become more flexible in order to obtain the best results and gain the US FDA/EMEA approval for the new drugs. A recent example of a failed trial is the Phase III MetLung trial that compared the effects of the c-MET monovalent antibody onartuzumab with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, we discuss several points as to why this trial could have failed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available