4.5 Article

Response rates in case-control studies of cancer by era of fieldwork and by characteristics of study design

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 385-391

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.04.001

Keywords

Cancer; Case-control studies; Epidemiologic methods; Participation rate; Response rate

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Society
  2. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe time trends in response rates in case-control studies of cancer and identify study design factors that influence response rate. Methods: We reviewed 370 case-control studies of cancer published in 12 journals during indicator years in each of the last four decades. We estimated time trends of response rates and reasons for nonresponse in each of the following types of study subjects: cases, medical source controls, and population controls. We also estimated response rates according to characteristics of study context. Results: Median response rates among cases and population controls were between 75% and 80% in the 1970s. Between 1971 and 2010, study response rates declined by 0.31% per year for cases and 0.78% for population controls. Only a minority of studies reported reasons for nonparticipation; subject refusal was the most common reported reason. Studies conducted in North America had lower median response rates than studies conducted in Europe. In-person and telephone interviews elicited higher response rates than mail questionnaires. Conclusions: Response rates from case-control studies of cancer have declined, and this could threaten the validity of results derived from these studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available