4.7 Article

Nanocarbon material-supported conducting poly(melamine) nanoparticle-modified screen-printed carbon electrodes for highly sensitive determination of nitrofuran drugs by adsorptive stripping voltammetry

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 410, Issue 25, Pages 6573-6583

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1262-9

Keywords

Nitrofurans; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Poly(melamine); Adsorption; Differential pulse voltammetry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China [MOST 104-2113-M-260-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxicity of nitrofuran drugs has attracted great attention, and the reported electroanalytical methods suffered limited sensitivity. In this work, a sensitive electrochemical assay in the cathodic region is developed to determine four nitrofuran derivatives, including nitrofurantoin (NFT), nitrofurazone (NFZ), furaltadone (FTD), and furazolidone (FZD). The screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) was used as the electrode substrate, and the sensing surface was composed of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and conducting poly(melamine) (PME). The overoxidation-pretreated MWCNTs affect the surface morphology of the electrodeposited PME and, thus, the interaction with nitrofuran drugs. The characteristics of the nanocomposite-modified electrode surfaces were well characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and surface water contact angle experiments. The nanocomposite-modified electrodes exhibited excellent adsorption and electrochemical reduction of nitrofurans by cyclic voltammetry. The proposed assay exhibited a linear range of sub-micro to micro molar concentrations for the four drugs under the optimized differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) technique. The detection limits were found to be in the nanomolar ranges. The developed assay was applied to detect NFT in two real samples, and the results showed good recoveries that ranged from 99.0 to 104.8% and 98.0 to 103.2% for milk and lake water samples, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available