4.5 Article

The association between borderline pre-operative anaemia in women and outcomes after cardiac surgery: a cohort study

Journal

ANAESTHESIA
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 572-578

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14185

Keywords

anaemia; cardiac surgery; transfusion; women

Categories

Funding

  1. CSL Behring
  2. Haemonetics
  3. Pharmacosmos
  4. Fisher and Paykel
  5. Massimo
  6. Brightwake Ltd.
  7. Vifor Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaemia is common before cardiac surgery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of anaemia is lower for women than for men by 10 g.l(-1), potentially putting women at a disadvantage compared with men with regard to pre-operative optimisation. Our hypothesis was that women with borderline anaemia (defined by us as haemoglobin concentration 120-129 g.l(-1)) would have a higher rate of red cell transfusion, morbidity and mortality than non-anaemic women (haemoglobin 130 g.l(-1)). This retrospective observational study included all adult patients admitted for elective cardiac surgery from January 2013 to April 2016. During the study period, 1388 women underwent cardiac surgery. Pre-operatively, 333 (24%) had a haemoglobin level < 120 g.l(-1); 408 (29%) 120-129 g.l(-1); and 647 (47%) 130 g.l(-1). Compared with non-anaemic women, women with borderline anaemia were more likely to be transfused (68.6% vs. 44.5%; RR 1.5, 95%CI 1.4-1.7; p < 0.0001) and were transfused with more units of red cells, mean (SD) 1.8 (2.8) vs. 1.3 (3.0); p < 0.0001. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the borderline anaemia group compared with non-anaemic women, median (IQR [range]) 8 (6-12 [3-45]) vs. 7 (6-11 [4-60]); p = 0.0159. Short- and long-term postoperative survival was comparable in both groups. Borderline anaemia is associated with increased red cell transfusion and prolonged hospital stay. Future research should address whether correction of borderline anaemia results in improved outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available