4.4 Article

Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 216, Issue 1, Pages 167-173

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.010

Keywords

Endoscopy; Simulation; Mastery learning; Endoscopic surgery; Standard setting

Categories

Funding

  1. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons [64089]
  2. Henry Jackson Foundation Cooperative Research and Development Agreement [gs2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulationbased mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Methods: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. Results: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 +/- 3.7 training trials over 2.75 +/- 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 +/- 7, post 78.1 +/- 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. Conclusions: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available