4.4 Article

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective Clinical Trial of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Prevention of Hypertrophic Scar Development in Median Sternotomy Wound

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1364-1369

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1187-x

Keywords

Botulinum toxin type A; Hypertrophic scar; Median sternotomy; Wound

Categories

Funding

  1. clinical high-tech projects of Xijing Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Linear hypertrophic scar is a common surgical problem that can be difficult to manage, especially for the median sternotomy scar. Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is widely used in cosmetic surgery and has been shown to improve scar quality recently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of BTA injected in the early postoperative of median sternotomy on preventing scar formation. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 19 consecutive patients who underwent median sternotomy were enrolled. The median sternotomy wound in each patient was divided into the upper half and the lower half. Both halves of the wound were randomized to receive the treatment with either BTA or normal saline. At 6-month follow-up, scars were assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale, scar widths were measured, and patients were asked to evaluate their overall satisfaction. Seventeen patients with median sternotomy wounds completed the entire study. At 6-month follow-up, the mean Vancouver Scar Scale score for the BTA-treated group was 3.44 +/- 1.68 and for the normal saline control group was 6.29 +/- 2.39, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). There were also significant improvements in scar width and patient satisfaction for the BTA-treated halves of the wounds (P < 0.05). The study demonstrates that early postoperative BTA injection can decrease scar formation and reduce scar width in median sternotomy wounds, and the overall appearance is more satisfactory. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available