4.6 Article

Clonogenic assay allows for selection of a primitive mammary epithelial cell population in bovine

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 338, Issue 2, Pages 245-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.08.016

Keywords

Bovine; Epithelial Cell; Mammary gland; Stem cell; Xenotransplantation

Funding

  1. University of Torino
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo [MAREATEN12]
  3. Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research [BARMPRIN12, MIUR-PRIN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adult mammary stem cells have been identified in several species including the bovine. They are responsible for the development of the gland and for cyclic remodeling during estrous cycles and pregnancy. Epithelial cell subpopulations exist within the mammary gland. We and others showed previously that the Colony Forming Cell (CFC) assay can be used to detect lineage-restricted mammary progenitors. We carried out CFCs with bovine mammary cells and manually separated colonies with specific morphologies associated with either a luminal or a myoepithelial phenotype. Expression of specific markers was assessed by immunocytochemistry or by flow cytometry to confirm that the manual separation resulted in isolation of phenotipically different cells. When transplanted in recipient immunodeficient mice, we found that only myoepithelial-like colonies gave rise to outgrowths that resembled bovine mammary alveoli, thus proving that adult stem cells were maintained during culture and segregated with myoepithelial cells. After recovery of the cells from the transplanted mice and subsequent progenitor content analysis, we found a tendency to detect a higher progenitor frequency when myoepithelial-like colonies were transplanted. We here demonstrate that bovine adult mammary stem cells can be sustained in short-term culture and that they can be enriched by manually selecting for basal-like morphology. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available