4.5 Article

Trait impulsivity and cognitive domains involving impulsivity and compulsivity as predictors of gambling disorder treatment response

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 169-176

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.006

Keywords

Gambling disorder; Impulsivity; Treatment; Inhibitory control; Cognitive flexibility; Compulsivity

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [PSI2015-68701-R]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [FIS PI14/00290]
  3. FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [FPU15/0291, FPU16/02087, FPU16/01453]
  5. AGAUR [2017FI_B1 00145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Gambling disorder (GD) is a highly heterogeneous condition with high rates of chronicity, relapses and treatment dropout. The aim of this study was to longitudinally explore the associations between trait impulsivity, impulsivity-compulsivity related cognitive domains, and treatment outcome in an outpatient sample of adult patients with GD. Methods: 144 adult male participants diagnosed with GD undergoing cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT) at a specialized outpatient service completed a series of neuropsychological tests to assess executive functioning (including cognitive flexibility, inhibition control and decision making) and psychometric questionnaires. Results: Trait impulsivity predicted low compliance [UPPS-P negative urgency (B = 0.113; p = 0.019)] and relapse [UPPS-P negative urgency (B = 0.140; p = 0.015)] at 5 weeks of treatment and dropout at the end of treatment [(UPPS-P sensation seeking B = 0.056; p = 0.045)]. Cognitive flexibility performance predicted: dropout rates at the end of treatment [WCST perseverative errors (B = 0.043; p = 0.042)]; dropout [WCST categories completed (B = -1.827; p = 0.020)] and low compliance or relapses at follow-up [WCST perseverative errors (B = 0.128; p = 0.020)]; and time to first relapse [WCST failure to maintain set (B = -0.374; p = 0.048)] and time to dropout [WCST perseverative errors (B = 0.0198; p = 0.019)]. Conclusions: Our findings indicate impulsivity-compulsivity levels may influence response to GD treatment (i.e.: low compliance and dropout or relapse rates) thus representing a potential target for improving treatment outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available