Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement

Meaningful Change Scores in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

(2018) Lina Holm Ingelsrud et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients

(2017) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population

(2017) D. F. Hamilton et al.   Bone & Joint Journal

Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty

(2016) Morten G Thomsen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries

(2016) Ola Rolfson et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the ‘Forgotten Joint’ Score before and after joint replacement

(2016) E. Thienpont et al.   KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY

When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time

(2016) Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis

(2015) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

(2015) David J. Beard et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers

(2015) Jonathan A Cook et al.   Trials

The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty

(2013) N. D. Clement et al.   KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY

Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty

(2013) K. Giesinger et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods

(2011) Lori D McLeod et al.   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods

(2011) Madeleine T King   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods

(2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY