4.1 Article

The Value of Total Antioxidant Status and Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels at 24-28 Weeks of Gestation in the Prediction of Optimal Treatment Protocol in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages 485-491

Publisher

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554623

Keywords

gestational diabetes mellitus; insulin requirement; oxidative stress; tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the serum oxidative stress markers, antioxidant enzyme and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels at 24-28 weeks of gestation and to evaluate the predictive value of them on the subsequent-treatment protocol in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A total of 58 GDM patients (30 treated with only conventional healthy dietary recommendation (CHDR), 28 treated with insulin) and 30 healthy pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation, were enrolled in this prospective case-control study. The oxidative status, antioxidant enzyme and TNF-alpha levels were evaluated to determine if there is an association with the need of insulin therapy for glycemic control by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results TNF-alpha (OR= 11.976, 95 %CI: 2.441-58.754, P=0.002) and total antioxidant status (TAS) (OR =12.769, 95 %CI: 2.464-66.182, P=0.002) were found to be predictive for GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Besides, further evaluation considering the treatment modality showed that increased TNF-alpha (OR = 18.615, 95 %CI: 2.338-148.240, P = 0.006) and lower TAS levels (OR = 99. 471, 95%CI: 2.865-3453.061, P= 0.011) were independent predictors of the need for insulin treatment in GDM patients. Conclusions Increased TNF-alpha levels and low TAS are significantly associated with the increased risk of insulin requirement for achieving good glycemic control in GDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available