4.8 Article

Elemental Identification by Combining Atomic Force Microscopy and Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 5274-5283

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08997

Keywords

hexagonal boron nitride; noncontact atomic force microscopy (nc-AFM); Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM); elemental contrast; van der Waals density functional theory

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC-2011-StG) [278698]
  2. Academy of Finland [305635, 311012, 314877, 314882, 284594, 284621]
  3. EU project PAMS [610446]
  4. CSC, Espoo [2000606]
  5. Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico (CSCS), Lugano [uzh11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are currently no experimental techniques that combine atomic-resolution imaging with elemental sensitivity and chemical fingerprinting on single molecules. The advent of using molecular-modified tips in noncontact atomic force microscopy (nc-AFM) has made it possible to image (planar) molecules with atomic resolution. However, the mechanisms responsible for elemental contrast with passivated tips are not fully understood. Here, we investigate elemental contrast by carrying out both nc-AFM and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) experiments on epitaxial monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) on Ir(111). The hBN overlayer is inert, and the in-plane bonds connecting nearest-neighbor boron and nitrogen atoms possess strong covalent character and a bond length of only similar to 1.45 angstrom. Nevertheless, constant-height maps of both the frequency shift Delta f and the local contact potential difference exhibit striking sublattice asymmetry. We match the different atomic sites with the observed contrast by comparison with nc-AFM image simulations based on the density functional theory optimized hBN/ Ir(111) geometry, which yields detailed information on the origin of the atomic-scale contrast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available