4.8 Article

Identification of Novel Inks for 3D Printing Using High-Throughput Screening: Bioresorbable Photocurable Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 6841-6848

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b15677

Keywords

3D printing; drug delivery; polymer materials; biomedical devices; sustained drug release

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005138/1, EP/1033335/2, EP/N006615/1, EP/N024818/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/R012415/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. EPSRC [EP/N024818/1, EP/P027261/1, EP/I033335/2, EP/N006615/1, EP/K005138/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/R012415/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005138/1, EP/P027261/1, EP/N024818/1, EP/N006615/1, EP/I033335/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A robust methodology is presented to identify novel biomaterials suitable for three-dimensional (3D) printing. Currently, the application of additive manufacturing is limited by the availability of functional inks, especially in the area of biomaterials; this is the first time when this method is used to tackle this problem, allowing hundreds of formulations to be readily assessed. Several functional properties, including the release of an antidepressive drug (paroxetine), cytotoxicity, and printability, are screened for 253 new ink formulations in a high-throughput format as well as mechanical properties. The selected candidates with the desirable properties are successfully scaled up using 3D printing into a range of object architectures. A full drug release study and degradability and tensile modulus experiments are presented on a simple architecture to validating the suitability of this methodology to identify printable inks for 3D printing devices with bespoke properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available