4.8 Article

Metal Organic Framework-Derived Hollow Carbon Nanocubes for Fast Solid-Phase Microextraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages 15051-15057

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b02281

Keywords

solid-phase microextraction; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; hollow carbon nanocubes; fast mass transfer; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478224]
  2. priority academic program development of Jiangsu higher education institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing novel coating materials for fast and sensitive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is highly desired but few are achieved. Target Target In this work, a new material of metal organic framework (MOF)-derived hollow carbon nanocubes (HCNCs) was prepared as a fiber coating material for SPME. The HCNC-coated fiber (denoted as HCNCs-F) exhibited a better enrichment performance than solid carbon nanocube (SCNC)-coated fiber (denoted as SCNCs-F) and commercial fibers based on the abundant active sites of the hollow structure, hydrophobic interactions, and pi-pi interactions. Moreover, because of the reduced mass transport lengths of the hollow mesoporous structure, the HCNCs-F demonstrated a faster mass transfer compared with the SCNCs-F. The HCNCs-F was used to determine the six hydrophobic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) with wide linear ranges (10-2000 ng L-1 for naphthalene and 5-2000 ng L-1 for the other five analytes), good reproducibility (relative standard deviation < 8.8%), and low detection limits (0.03-0.70 ng L-1). Finally, the HCNCs-F was successfully applied for the determination of PAHs from the real water samples. It can be concluded from the results that MOF-derived hollow carbon materials are promising candidates for the fast SPME and can be used for practical applications in analytical chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available