4.3 Article

In the Clinic They Know Us: Preferences for Clinic-Based Financial and Employment Services in Urban Pediatric Primary Care

Journal

ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 912-919

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.06.008

Keywords

Employment; Financial literacy; Poverty; Primary care

Categories

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins Children's Center Special Project Fund
  2. Johns Hopkins Primary Care Consortium
  3. Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To understand views of adolescent and adult caregivers on integrating employment and financial services into a pediatric primary care clinic serving low-income families. METHODS: Eighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted among caregivers of pediatric patients. Participants were recruited from those who completed a survey assessing financial and employment needs. Audio-recorded transcripts were analyzed using line-by-line coding of emerging themes. RESULTS: Adolescent and adult caregivers expressed difficulty managing financial stress. They cited having a criminal history, limited financial literacy, and lack of available quality jobs as barriers to achieving financial stability. A clinic-based employment and financial program was highly acceptable among potential users for the convenience it offers and the established trust and understanding between patients and clinical providers. Participants preferred one-on-one counseling for sensitive employment and financial issues, although they did believe that some topics, such as building a resume, could be accomplished in group workshops. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers attending a pediatric clinic expressed interest in and anticipated value from clinic-based employment and financial services if implemented services are relevant, accessible, and provide options for group and individualized approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available