4.5 Article

SWS2 visual pigment evolution as a test of historically contingent patterns of plumage color evolution in warblers

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 341-356

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12572

Keywords

Ancestral reconstructions; convergent evolution; correlated evolution; historical contingency; opsins; visual pigment in vitro expression

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [NRSA 1F31EY020105]
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB 1209876]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distantly related clades that occupy similar environments may differ due to the lasting imprint of their ancestorshistorical contingency. The New World warblers (Parulidae) and Old World warblers (Phylloscopidae) are ecologically similar clades that differ strikingly in plumage coloration. We studied genetic and functional evolution of the short-wavelength-sensitive visual pigments (SWS2 and SWS1) to ask if altered color perception could contribute to the plumage color differences between clades. We show SWS2 is short-wavelength shifted in birds that occupy open environments, such as finches, compared to those in closed environments, including warblers. Phylogenetic reconstructions indicate New World warblers were derived from a finch-like form that colonized from the Old World 15-20 Ma. During this process, the SWS2 gene accumulated six substitutions in branches leading to New World warblers, inviting the hypothesis that passage through a finch-like ancestor resulted in SWS2 evolution. In fact, we show spectral tuning remained similar across warblers as well as the finch ancestor. Results reject the hypothesis of historical contingency based on opsin spectral tuning, but point to evolution of other aspects of visual pigment function. Using the approach outlined here, historical contingency becomes a generally testable theory in systems where genotype and phenotype can be connected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available