4.4 Article

Gifting, ridding and the everyday mundane: the role of class and privilege in food waste generation in Indonesia

Journal

LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1444-1460

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1357689

Keywords

Food waste; consumption; class; household; Indonesia; justice

Funding

  1. International Development Research Centre [107759-028]
  2. Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation [895438919RR0001]
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [767-2014-2619-A28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current research on household food waste has not considered the impact of the inter-class power dynamics between employers and domestic helpers on food waste management and generation in the Global South. This article focuses on the issue of food justice and will demonstrate that it is important to reconsider household food practices within the framework of unequal power dynamics in household units -especially between employers and their domestic helpers. Informed by food waste regime conceptual framework, this paper will examine the complex food provisioning practices of Indonesian households. The research draws on 21 in-depth interviews with households of varying incomes, multiple site visits, participant observation and going along on grocery trips to better understand the power dynamics and practices that result in, or prevent the generation of household food waste. In addition, 12 key informant interviews with government officials, traditional food vendors, supermarket managers, and a waste collector was also conducted. In an Indonesian context, understanding the interclass dynamics of the household, namely, who gets to define what is food and what is waste is key to understanding the broader phenomenon of food waste in order to promote solutions to food waste prevention and food insecurity that is socially and environmentally just.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available