4.4 Article

Molecular viability testing of viable but non-culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure

Journal

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1008-1016

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13039

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [R-302-000-137-133]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 1 grant [R-302-000-144-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleic acid amplification-based methods are limited by their inability to discriminate between viable and dead cells. To overcome this drawback, propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with qPCR has been used to differentiate viable from nonviable cells in environmental samples. However, assessing bacterial physiology using PMA-qPCR remains a challenge due to its incapability of detecting metabolic activities, leading to overestimation of the viable bacteria population under an inactivation condition (e.g. antibiotic treatments). A recent advanced technique to amplify ribosomal RNA precursors (pre-rRNA) has been shown to detect viable cells because pre-rRNAs are intermediates in rRNA synthesis. This study investigated the effect of different types of antibiotics on the bacterial viability or viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state using both PMA-qPCR and pre-rRNA analyses with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study demonstrated that P.aeruginosa was more sensitive to colistin than it was to carbenicillin, gentamicin and levofloxacin. We could discriminate VBNCP.aeruginosa cells using PMA-qPCR when antibiotic pressure induced the VBNC state. Also, pre-rRNA was able to distinguish viable cells from colistin-inactivated bacteria cells, and it could detect the presence of VBNC and persister cells. Our results showed that these two molecular methods could successfully eliminate false-positive signals derived from antibiotics-inactivated cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available