4.7 Article

Angiotensin-II-induced Muscle Wasting is Mediated by 25-Hydroxycholesterol via GSK3β Signaling Pathway

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages 238-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.040

Keywords

Cardiac cachexia; Heart failure; TNF-alpha; Angiotensin II; Ch25h

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670358, 81120108003, 81330007]
  2. Jiangsu Province Key Scientific and Technological Project [BE2016669]
  3. project for the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Suzhou Science and Technology Project [SS201665]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While angiotensin II (ang II) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiac cachexia (CC), the molecules that mediate ang II's wasting effect have not been identified. It is known TNF-alpha level is increased in patients with CC, and TNF-alpha release is triggered by ang II. We therefore hypothesized that ang II induced muscle wasting is mediated by TNF-alpha. Ang II infusion led to skeletal muscle wasting in wild type (WT) but not in TNF alpha type 1 receptor knockout (TNFR1KO) mice, suggesting that ang II induced muscle loss is mediated by TNF-alpha through its type 1 receptor. Microarray analysis identified cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (Ch25h) as the down stream target of TNF-alpha. Intraperitoneal injection of 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OHC), the product of Ch25h, resulted inmuscle loss in C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by increased expression of atrogin-1, MuRF1 and suppression of IGF-1/Akt signaling pathway. The identification of 25-OHC as an inducer of muscle wasting has implications for the development of specific treatment strategies in preventing muscle loss. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available