4.8 Article

Residential relocation and change in social capital: A natural experiment from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700426

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 AG042463]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKENHI 23243070, KAKENHI 22390400, KAKENHI 24390469]
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [H22-Choju-Shitei-008, H24-Choju-Wakate-009]
  4. Strategic Research Foundation [S0991035]
  5. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05692, 26220502] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social connections in the community (social capital) represent an important source of resilience in the aftermath of major disasters. However, little is known about how residential relocation due to housing destruction affects survivors' social capital. We examined changes in social capital among survivors of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. People who lost their homes were resettled to new locations by two primary means: (i) group relocation to public temporary trailer housing or (ii) individual relocation, in which victimsmoved into government-provided housing by lottery or arranged for theirown accommodation (market rental housing or private purchase/new construction). The baseline for our natural experiment was established 7 months before the 11 March 2011 disaster, when we conducted a survey of older community-dwelling adultswho lived 80-km west of the earthquake epicenter. Approximately 2.5 years after the disaster, the follow-up survey gathered information about personal experiences of disaster as well as health status and social capital. Among 3421 people in our study, 79 people moved via group relocation to public temporary trailer housing, whereas 96 people moved on their own. The individual fixed-effects model showed that group relocationwas associated with improved informal socializing and social participation (beta coefficient = 0.053, 95% confidence interval: 0.011 to 0.095). In contrast, individual relocationwas associated with declining informal socializing and social participation (beta coefficient = -0.039, 95% confidence interval: -0.074 to -0.003). Group relocation, as compared to individual relocation, appeared to preserve social participation and informal socializing in the community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available