4.5 Article

Radial Growth and Physiological Response of Coniferous Trees to Arctic Amplification

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 122, Issue 11, Pages 2786-2803

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JG003745

Keywords

circumpolar; boreal forest; tree-ring width; carbon isotope; climate change; dynamic global vegetation model

Funding

  1. Green Network of Excellence (GRENE) Program - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan (MEXT)
  2. COPERA (C budget of ecosystems and cities and villages on permafrost in eastern Russian Arctic) project - Belmont Forum
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H04492, 26281003, 26101002] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the physiological responses of boreal conifers to climate change for the past 112years using ring-width and carbon isotope ratio (C-13) chronologies at six forest sites in northern Eurasia and Canada. Responses differed among regions, depending on their climatic and/or geographic characteristics. Tree radial growth decreased over the past 52years in central eastern Siberia with the higher rate of summer temperature increase than other regions, as indicated by the negative correlation between radial growth and summer temperature, but increased in northern Europe and Canada. Changes in tree-ring C-13 indicated that recent climatic conditions have induced stronger drought stress for trees from central eastern Siberia than for those from other regions. The observed tree growth trends were compared to those simulated using a dynamic global vegetation model. Although the modeled annual net primary production (NPP) for trees generally exhibited similar decadal variation to radial growth, simulations did not show a recent decrease in tree growth, even in central eastern Siberia. This was probably due to an overestimation of the sensitivity of modeled tree NPP to precipitation. Our results suggest that the tree NPP forecasted under the expected future increases in temperature and average precipitation might be overestimated, especially in severely dry regions such as central eastern Siberia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available