4.5 Article

Tidal Pumping-Induced Nutrients Dynamics and Biogeochemical Implications in an Intertidal Aquifer

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 3322-3342

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JG004017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41372261]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKU 7028/06P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tidal pumping is a major driving force affecting water exchange between land and sea, biogeochemical reactions in the intertidal aquifer, and nutrient loading to the sea. At a sandy beach of Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong, the nutrient (NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, and PO43-) dynamic in coastal groundwater mixing zone (CGMZ) is found to be fluctuated with tidal oscillation. Nutrient dynamic is mainly controlled by tidal pumping-induced organic matter that serves as a reagent of remineralization in the aquifer. NH4+, NO2-, and PO43- are positively correlated with salinity. Both NH4+ and PO43- have negative correlations with oxidation/reduction potential. NH4+ is the major dissolved inorganic nitrogen species in CGMZ. The adsorption of PO43- onto iron oxides occurs at the deep transition zone with a salinity of 5-10 practical salinity unit (psu), and intensive N-loss occurs in near-surface area with a salinity of 10-25 psu. The biogeochemical reactions, producing PO43- and consuming NH4+, are synergistic effect of remineralization-nitrification-denitrification. In CGMZ, the annual NH4+ loss is estimated to be similar to 4.32 x 10(5) mol, while the minimum annual PO43- production is estimated to be similar to 2.55 x 10(4) mol. Applying these rates to the entire Tolo Harbour, the annual NH4+ input to the harbor through the remineralization of organic matters is estimated to be similar to 1.02 x 10(7) mol. The annual NH4+ loss via nitrification is 1.32 x 10(7) mol, and the annual PO43- production is similar to 7.76 x 10(5) mol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available