The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity
Authors
Keywords
Core outcome measures, Adult deformity, SRS-22, Surgery, Non-operative treatment
Journal
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 2638-2648
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-10-30
DOI
10.1007/s00586-015-4292-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back)
- (2015) Istvan Klemencsics et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain
- (2015) Alessandro Chiarotto et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Could Less Be More When Assessing Patient-Rated Outcome in Spinal Stenosis?
- (2015) Anne F. Mannion et al. SPINE
- Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study
- (2014) Stéphane Genevay et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Focus article: report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain
- (2014) Richard A. Deyo et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions
- (2014) Ferran Pellisé et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination
- (2014) J. Haxby Abbott et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Spine Tango annual report 2012
- (2013) M. Neukamp et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck
- (2013) Marco Monticone et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)
- (2013) Jun Qiao et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain
- (2012) Kjersti Storheim et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain
- (2012) Grzegorz Miekisiak et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain
- (2011) Stéphane Genevay et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index
- (2011) A. F. Mannion et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language
- (2011) L. H. F. Damasceno et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index
- (2009) A. F. Mannion et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: The Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice
- (2009) Anne F. Mannion et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango
- (2009) T. Zweig et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Pain and Disability Determine Treatment Modality for Older Patients With Adult Scoliosis, While Deformity Guides Treatment for Younger Patients
- (2009) Shay Bess et al. SPINE
- The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results
- (2008) Markus Melloh et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started