4.7 Article Data Paper

Data Descriptor: Personality in the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.146

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology
  2. Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute
  3. Tanzania National Parks
  4. National Science Foundation [BCS-9021946, BCS-0452315, BCS-0648481, BCS-9319909, IIS-0431141, IOS-1052693, DGE-1106401]
  5. National Institutes of Health [R01-AI058715]
  6. Harris Steel Group, University of Minnesota
  7. Duke University
  8. Carnegie Trust
  9. Jane Goodall Institute
  10. NSF [EF-0905606]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers increasingly view animal personality traits as products of natural selection. We present data that describe the personalities of 128 eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) currently living in or who lived their lives in the Kasekela and Mitumba communities of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. We obtained ratings on 24 items from an established, reliable, well-validated questionnaire used to study personality in captive chimpanzee populations. Ratings were made by former and present Tanzanian field assistants who followed individual chimpanzees for years and collected detailed behavioral observations. Interrater reliabilities across items ranged from acceptable to good, but the personality dimensions they formed were not as interpretable as those from captive samples. However, the personality dimensions corresponded to ratings of 24 Kasekela chimpanzees on a different questionnaire in 1973 that assessed some similar traits. These correlations established the repeatability and construct validity of the present ratings, indicating that the present data can facilitate historical and prospective studies that will lead to better understanding of the evolution of personality in chimpanzees and other primates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available