Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials : A free and simple tool for meta-analysis
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials
: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 537-553
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-08-12
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1260
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Lessons from contemporary trials of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2017) Gijs van Halewijn et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Executive functioning deficits among adults with Bipolar Disorder (types I and II): A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2017) Tania Dickinson et al. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
- BRAF Mutation is Associated with an Improved Survival in Glioma—a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2017) Huy Gia Vuong et al. MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
- Functional lesional neurosurgery for tremor—a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2017) Sebastian R Schreglmann et al. BMJ Open
- Basics of meta-analysis:I2is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity
- (2017) Michael Borenstein et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
- (2017) Huy Gia Vuong et al. Endocrine Connections
- Muscle activation comparisons between elastic and isoinertial resistance: A meta-analysis
- (2016) Saied Jalal Aboodarda et al. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
- Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis
- (2016) Amit Kiran et al. HEART
- Association between depression and resilience in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2016) Maria Priscila Wermelinger Ávila et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
- Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Objective Cognitive Function in Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Cross-Sectional Findings
- (2016) Bridget Burmester et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
- (2014) Joanna IntHout et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Learning by doing-teaching systematic review methods in 8 weeks
- (2014) Tianjing Li et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development
- (2013) Tingting Yan et al. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis
- (2013) Yeojin Chung et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- On the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market
- (2012) Johan Perols et al. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- Effects of Supplier and Customer Integration on Product Innovation and Performance: Empirical Evidence in Hong Kong Manufacturers
- (2010) Antonio K. W. Lau et al. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
- The Relative Merits of Risk Ratios and Odds Ratios
- (2009) Peter Cummings ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now