4.4 Article

Reduced GABAergic neuronal activity in zona incerta causes neuropathic pain in a rat sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury model

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 1125-1134

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S131104

Keywords

sciatic nerve injury; chronic pain; neuropathic pain; zona incerta; neural cell recording; GABA

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF 2014K1A3A1A21001372, NRF2016H1D5A1908909]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014K1A3A1A21001372] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The zona incerta (ZI) is below the ventral tier of the thalamus and has a strong influence selectively in higher-order thalamic relays. Although neuropathic pain has been suggested to result from reduced gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and GABAergic signaling in the ZI, the mechanisms remain unclear. Here, the role of GABA and GABAergic signaling was investigated in the ZI in neuropathic pain using sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI) rats. Materials and methods: Single-unit neuronal activity was recorded, and microdialysis was performed in the ZI of CCI rats and sham-treated rats in vivo. This study also compared ZI neuronal activity after treatment with saline, the GABA(A) receptor agonist (muscimol), or the GABA(A) receptor antagonist (bicuculline). Results and conclusion: CCI rats exhibited hypersensitivity to pain as evidenced by decreased hind paw withdrawal threshold and latency. CCI rats also showed reduced GAB(A) level and decreased neuronal activity in the ZI compared with sham-treated rats. Treatment with GABA A receptor agonist, but not GABA(A) receptor antagonist, ameliorated pain hypersensitivity and increased the firing rate (spikes/s) of ZI neurons in CCI rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available