4.0 Article

Geochemistry and sedimentary provenance of the Upper Cretaceous Uberaba Formation (Southeastern Triangulo Mineiro, MG, Brazil)

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 159-182

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA GEOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/2317-4889201720170032

Keywords

Uberaba Formation; Alkaline magmatism; Triangulo Mineiro; Provenance; Upper Cretaceous

Funding

  1. Companhia do Desenvolvimento do Estado de Minas Gerais (CODEMIG)
  2. Centro de Pesquisas Manoel Teixeira da Costa (CPMTC-IGC-UFMG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The campanian Uberaba Formation, which crops out around the homonymous town, is composed of greenish lithic sandstones and conglomerates with possible volcanoclastic contribution. In this unit, heavy minerals such as ilmenite, garnet, perovskite and magnetite, besides clinopyroxene, plagioclase, quartz, calcite and apatite, are found. The Uberaba Formation geochemistry is marked by high grades of Ba, Ta, La, Nb and Th, with flat (no Eu anomaly) and highly fractionated (La-N/Yb-N = ca. 128) chondrite-normalized rare earth elements. Mineral chemistry analyses of detrital garnets from the Uberaba Formation indicate the predominance of chorlomite with an affinity to crustal garnets (G3). The sedimentary provenance of the Uberaba Formation corresponds to a mixing of materials from the alkaline districts of the Alto Paranaiba and from the erosion of the Serra Geral Formation and the Canastra and Araxa groups. Diamond-producing conglomerates which crop out nearby, in Romaria, were considered by some authors as correlated to the Uberaba Formation. However, the composition of garnets recovered from those conglomerates is different, plotting in the field of mantle garnets (G9/G10). We consider, then, that those units are not correlated, and that the Uberaba Formation is not a possible source for the alluvial diamonds found in the homonymous river.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available