4.4 Article

The QUALYOR (QUalite Osseuse LYon Orleans) study: a new cohort for non invasive evaluation of bone quality in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Rationale and study design

Journal

ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0412-6

Keywords

Osteoporosis; Fracture; Osteopenia; Microarchitecture

Funding

  1. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (French Ministry of Health)
  2. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.
  3. Hospices Civils de Lyon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Summary The diagnostic performance of densitometry is inadequate. New techniques of non-invasive evaluation of bone quality may improve fracture risk prediction. Testing the value of these techniques is the goal of the QUALYOR cohort. Introduction The bone mineral density (BMD) of postmenopausal women who sustain osteoporotic fracture is generally above the World Health Organization definition for osteoporosis. Therefore, new approaches to improve the detection of women at high risk for fracture are warranted. Methods We have designed and recruited a new cohort to assess the predictive value of several techniques to assess bone quality, including high-resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (HRpQCT), hip QCT, calcaneus texture analysis, and biochemical markers. We have enrolled 1575 postmenopausal women, aged at least 50, with an areal BMD femoral neck or lumbar spine T-score between - 1.0 and - 3.0. Clinical risk factors for fracture have been collected along with serum and blood samples. Results We describe the design of the QUALYOR study. Among these 1575 women, 80% were aged at least 60. The mean femoral neck T-score was - 1.6 and the mean lumbar spine T-score was -1.2. This cohort is currently being followed up. Conclusions QUALYOR will provide important information on the relationship between bone quality variables and fracture risk in women with moderately decreased BMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available