4.3 Article

Minimization of dental implant diameter and length according to bone quality determined by finite element analysis and optimized calculation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 324-332

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.004

Keywords

Implant; Bone quality; Finite element analysis; Mandible; Optimization

Funding

  1. Japan Society of the Promotion of Science [24592892]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592892] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of bone quality and implant size on the maximum equivalent elastic strain (MES) in peri-implant bone using finite element (FE) analysis, and to minimize implant size via optimized calculation based on MES. Methods: Three-dimensional FE models consisting of a mandible and a titanium implant with a superstructure were constructed and applied a vertical load or an oblique load of 60 N. We investigated the effects of four variables: the thickness of the cortical bone (C), Young's modulus of the trabecular bone (T), and the diameter (D) and length (L) of the implant. According to the variables determined using Latin hypercube sampling, 500 FE models were constructed and analyzed under each of the loads following the construction of response surfaces with the MES as a response value. D and L were minimized by optimized calculation with the MES limited to the physiological limit with reference to the mechanostat theory. Results: The MES was significantly influenced by D more than L, and could be restricted to the physiological limit unless both C and T were small. Larger MES than physiological limit was observed around the bottom of implants. Conclusions: From the viewpoint of the mechanostat theory, we calculated minimum size of implants according to the bone quality. However, the results should be verified with more detailed FE models made using CT data, animal studies and clinical prognoses. (C) 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available