4.5 Article

Hippocampal AMPARs involve the central sensitization of rats with irritable bowel syndrome

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.650

Keywords

AMPARs; hippocampus; irritable bowel syndrome; long-term potentiation; visceral hypersensitivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471138, 81500416]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2014J01124, 2015J01311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The roles of hippocampal AMPARs were investigated in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like rats to clarify the central sensitization mechanisms. Methods: IBS model was induced by neonatal maternal separation. The effects of AMPARs on visceral hypersensitivity were examined by the responses of abdominal muscle to colorectal distension after the bilateral intrahippocampal injections of CNQX (an AMPAR inhibitor). The expressions of hippocampal AMPARs (GluR1 and GluR2) were determined by Western blot. Results: The IBS-like rats showed visceral hypersensitivity when compared with controls. Bilateral intrahippocampal injections of CNQX alleviated the visceral pain in IBS-like rats. The maximal effect appeared at the time point of 30 min, and the duration lasted for 90 min after CNQX application, under 40 and 60 mmHg CRD. The expressions of hippocampal GluR2 significantly increased in IBS-like rats when compared with controls (p <.05). However, the levels of hippocampal GluR1 had no significant differences in rats. Hippocampal LTP induced by HFS was significantly enhanced when compared with controls (p <.05). The expressions of GluR2 significantly increased in the control and IBS-like rats after 60 min LTP of recordings (p <.05), but not GluR1. Conclusion: Neonatal maternal separation enhances the expression of GluR2 and facilitates the LTP in the hippocampus, which could lead to the formation of visceral hypersensitivity when grown up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available