4.5 Article

Urban habitats can affect body size and body condition but not immune response in amphibians

Journal

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1331-1338

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0685-y

Keywords

Amphibian conservation; Lissotriton helveticus; Pelophylax perezi; PHA; Salamandra salamandra; Triturus marmoratus

Funding

  1. City hall of Donostia/San Sebastian
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture [FPU12/04148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Does urbanization affect key life-history traits in native organisms? Some studies show that urban areas reduce diversity in certain taxa, but there is little insight into how these environments affect physiological and ecological traits. Urban areas have distinct physical structure and ecological processes compared to original habitats. The environmental changes associated with urban areas can influence the costs and benefits of different traits and behaviors of local organisms. Some of these effects have been explored in groups such as birds, but we might expect stronger effects in animals with reduced mobility, such as amphibians. Importantly, the effects of urban habitats on amphibians have not been explored, in spite that these are the most threatened vertebrate group in the world. Here, we compared three main traits related to the fitness of amphibians in urban and natural habitats: body size, body condition and immune response. To test the generality of our results, we assessed adult males of four amphibian species. We found that the body size was larger in urban environment populations in three of four studied species, while the body condition was better in the urban populations of two aquatic newt species. Finally, we found no effect of urbanization on the immune response of individuals of any species. In conclusion, we show that different species of amphibians may be affected differently by anthropogenic habitat alteration depending on their specific ecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available