4.6 Article

Tunisian Extra Virgin Olive Oil Traceability in the EEC Market: Tunisian/Italian (Coratina) EVOOs Blend as a Case Study

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/su9081471

Keywords

extra virgin olive oil; commercial purpose; H-1-NMR spectroscopy; EVOOs origin assessment; multivariate statistical analysis; PLSR; projections to latent structure by means of partial least squares regression

Funding

  1. PON (Programma Operativo Nazionale) [254/Ricerca]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to check the reliability of an NMR-based metabolomic approach to evaluating blend composition (and declaration), a series of 81 Italian/Tunisian blends samples at different percentage composition (from 10/90 to 90/10% Coratina/Tunisian oil by 10% increase step) were prepared starting from five Coratina (Apulia) and five Tunisian extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) batches. Moreover, a series of nine binary mixtures blend oils were obtained, starting from the two batches' oil sums. The models built showed the linear relationship between the NMR signals and the percentage composition of the blends. In particular, a high correlation with the percentage composition of blends was obtained from the partial least squares (PLS) regression model, when the two batches oil sums were used for the binary mixtures of blend samples. These proposed methods suggest that a multivariate analysis (MVA)-based NMR approachin particular PLS regression (PLSR)could be a very useful tool (including for trading purposes) to assess quantitative blend composition. This is important for the sustainability of the goods' free movement, especially in the agrifood sector. This cornerstone policy of current common markets is also clearly linked to the availability of methods for certifying the origin of the foodstuffs and their use in the assembly of final product for the consumer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available