4.8 Article

Synchrotron-based x-ray absorption spectroscopy for the electronic structure of LixMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 mesocrystal in Li+ batteries

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 495-503

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.044

Keywords

LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4; Electronic structure; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Rate capability

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF: 2015K2A1A2070386, 2016R1A2B4012938]
  2. Office of Naval Research Global [ONRG: N62909-16-1-2083]
  3. Institute for Basic Science, Republic of Korea [IBS-R006-G1]
  4. NRF grant [2015R1D1A1A01056874]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1D1A1A01056874, 2016R1A2B4012938] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The carbon-coated LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 (LMFP) mesocrystal, composed of similar to 40-nm-sized nanocrystallites, was designed to be favorable for the fast charge transport kinetics. The carbon-coated LMFP mesocrystal exhibited good electrochemical properties (i.e., high specific capacity and superior rate capability), ensuring that the LMFP mesocrystal is a proper model system to study the reaction mechanism upon the battery cycling. In order to investigate the electronic-structure effects of each transition metal (Mn and Fe) on the electrochemical performance, we performed synchrotron-based soft and hard x-ray absorption spectroscopy (sXAS and XAS), and quantitatively analyzed the changes of the transition-metal redox states in the carbon-coated LMFP electrodes during the electrochemical reaction. We believe that our comprehensive as well as complementary analyses using ex situ sXAS and in situ XAS can provide clear experimental evidence on the reaction mechanism of LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 electrodes during battery operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available