4.6 Article

Stacking up layers of polyaniline/carbon nanotube networks inside papers as highly flexible electrodes with large areal capacitance and superior rate capability

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 37, Pages 19934-19942

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta06135h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research (973) Program of China [2014CB932400]
  2. Shenzhen Technical Plan Projects [JCYJ20160301154114273]
  3. CERC-CVC [2016YFE0102200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing high-performance flexible film-like electrodes is still a primary task for the practical applications of wearable/portable planar supercapacitors. In this work, a facile and effective approach, i.e., stacking up layers of polyaniline (PANI)/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite networks inside air-laid papers, is proposed to fabricate highly flexible paper electrodes with large areal capacitance and superior rate capability. The layer-by-layer deposition of PANI/CNT networks endows the fabricated paper electrodes with high loading and uniform distribution of PANI; meanwhile, the good electrical conductivity and porous structure of these introduced PANI/CNT networks guarantee sufficient paths for electron movement and ion transportation in the electrodes. Consequently, when 4 layers of PANI/CNT networks (with optimal PANI content) are stacked inside papers, the areal capacitance of the prepared electrode is as high as 1506 mF cm(-2) at a charge/discharge current of 10 mA cm(-2) and 1298 mF cm(-2) at 100 mA cm(-2); the electrode also exhibits high flexibility and good cycling stability (with 82% capacitance retention after 11 500 charge/discharge cycles). These merits make our PANI/CNT/papers promising candidates for flexible planar supercapacitor electrodes. Besides, this work is believed to provide a new thought for producing high-loading and high-energy wearable/portable energy storage devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available