4.6 Article

Alumina-supported sub-nanometer Pt10 clusters: amorphization and role of the support material in a highly active CO oxidation catalyst

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 4923-4931

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta10989f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, BESMaterials Science and Engineering [DE-AC-02-06CH11357]
  2. UChicago Argonne, LLC
  3. US Department of Energy, Scientific User Facilities [DE-AC-02-06CH11357]
  4. ERC-AG SEPON project
  5. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. European Social Fund (ESF)
  7. federal state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern within the project Nano4Hydrogen
  8. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project Light2-Hydrogen
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catalytic CO oxidation is unveiled on size-selected Pt-10 clusters deposited on two very different ultrathin (approximate to 0.5-0.7 nm thick) alumina films: (i) a highly ordered alumina obtained under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) by oxidation of the NiAl(110) surface and (ii) amorphous alumina obtained by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on a silicon chip that is a close model of real-world supports. Notably, when exposed to realistic reaction conditions, the Pt-10/UHV-alumina system undergoes a morphological transition in both the clusters and the substrate, and becomes closely akin to Pt-10/ALD-alumina, thus reconciling UHV-type surface-science and real-world experiments. The Pt-10 clusters, thoroughly characterized via combined experimental techniques and theoretical analysis, exhibit among the highest CO oxidation activity per Pt atom reported for CO oxidation catalysts, due to the interplay of ultra-small size and support effects. A coherent interdisciplinary picture then emerges for this catalytic system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available